Compulsory ‘conflict clinics’ could mean children of divorce could avoid being affected
A recent report in The Times has revealed new plans from the conservative party to save children from the emotional turmoil of the often bitter custody battle.
70% of parents claim to have their childrens welfare as their top priority during a break-up or divorce; however, a recent study suggests quite the contrary with two thirds of parents admitting to using their children as a bargaining chip.
In a bid to save children from an emotional tug of war, it has been suggested that instead of these dramas playing out in court, “conflict clinics” should be attended where disputes can be resolved. It has been suggested that should the conservative party come out on top of the next election, clinics like these could become a reality. Maria Miller, the shadow family minister has been researched Australian “family relationship centres” which a view of creating similar schemes here.
Under new proposals, dispute resolutions would be compulsory, with no one being allowed to make a divorce application without a certificate saying they have been through resolution and failed. Parents would also be given an incentive to use such conflict clinics by making it twice as expensive to apply for contact orders through the courts than to undergo family therapy. Under such a scheme only the most difficult cases would end up in court.
December 5th, 2009 at 12:49 am
Here in the States, we try to recommend using what we call “Mediation Services.”
This can be very helpful in coming to conclusions before a divorce is finally settled into.
Thinking things through the right way with a trained professional to guide the decisioning process can be very beneficial.
One might think “they thought of everything, and that’s why we ended up here!” but to truly be guided by a professional mediator is to be coached on the thinking process itself.
I like the idea of Conflict Clinics. I hope this goes well for your readers in your area.